> From: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > > From: "Vadim Gritsenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > 3. Should we remove ability to define components in the sitemap, and > > > provide ability to declare components in the separate user.conf file > > > (optional, one per sitemap). > > > > My two cents: > > > > - cocoon.xconf (basic cocoon components, one only) > > - user.xconf (user components, one only) > > - sitemap.xmap (as always) > > - sitemap.xconf (one per sitemap, contains Generators, Transformers, etc.) > > People, please, order!
:) > The sense/nonsense ratio in this thread is dangerously low. > > Torsten, > > I do see the need for componentized Cocoon apps, but in order to provide > this a significant number of things must change in Cocoon. Can we do this step by step? ;) Then, one of the steps might well be some changes in sitemap's component management infrastructure. Vadim > My idea is: let's make it a fully-baked solution, rather than a > half-baked 'it does what I need so I'm happy' one. > > Ken, > > Cocoon Blocks are *not* generators, transformers and the like, these are > *components*, just implement different interfaces. > > Expect a full-blown RT describing my concept of 'Cocoon Blocks' and how > to allow you guys do hot-deploy your stuff on Cocoon very soon. > > -- > Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be > able to give birth to a dancing star. > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche > -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
