Hello Vadim,
sorry but you new patch gives although a NullPointerException, I even
added 
this.setContentHandler(this.handler);
this.setLexicalHandler(this.handler);
to the recycle because both handler are set to null in 
DOMBuilder-->AbstractXMLPipe-->AbstractXMLProducer.recycle(), but
this leads to some error reporting about only one root element for document
allowed.

So my suggested patch (suboptimal but working)
 - without attribute this.hadler
 - with attribute this.paretnNode
looks like the following:

--- work/cocoon-2.0.1/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/xml/dom/DOMBuilder.java_orig  Fri Mar 
 8 17:51:11 2002
+++ work/cocoon-2.0.1/src/java/org/apache/cocoon/xml/dom/DOMBuilder.java       Fri Mar 
+ 8 19:53:47 2002
@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
     /** The result */
     protected DOMResult result;
 
+    /** The parentNode */
+    protected Node parentNode;
+
     /**
      * Construct a new instance of this TreeGenerator.
      */
@@ -83,6 +86,7 @@
             TransformerHandler handler = factory.newTransformerHandler();
             this.setContentHandler(handler);
             this.setLexicalHandler(handler);
+            this.parentNode = parentNode;
             if (parentNode != null) {
                 this.result = new DOMResult( parentNode );
             } else {
@@ -109,7 +113,21 @@
      */
     public void recycle() {
         super.recycle();
-        this.result = null;
+        try {
+           TransformerHandler handler = factory.newTransformerHandler();
+           this.setContentHandler(handler);
+           this.setLexicalHandler(handler);
+           if (this.parentNode != null) {
+               this.result = new DOMResult(this.parentNode);
+           } else {
+               this.result = new DOMResult();
+           }
+           handler.setResult(this.result);
+           
+       } catch (javax.xml.transform.TransformerException local) {
+            throw new RuntimeException("Fatal-Error: Unable to get transformer 
+handler");
+       }
+        
     }
 
     /**
 
Peter


On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 05:50:52PM -0500, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> I do not like re-creating transformer every time; it's quite expensive
> operation (IIRC). It should be enough just provide new result object
> instance.
> 
> Could you try attached version?
> 
> Thanks,
> Vadim


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Seiderer                     E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to