On Mon, 11 Mar 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > giacomo wrote: > > >On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > > > >>giacomo wrote: > >> > >>>As always when Sylvain gets engadged he has very good arguments which > >>>convinced me to support moving thoes classes out of Cocoon and only > >>>leave the serializer and Avalon component glue code in Cocoon's CVS. > >>> > >>Thanks, Giacomo. I value your judgment as you are one of the Cocoon > >>"wise men". > >> > > > >Boy, that sound like I'm an old man :) > > > You can't say you're not a Cocoon old-timer ;)
No, I can't say I'm an Cocoon old-timer but a "wise men" has a long beard doesn't have to learn anymore and uses a cane to walk :/ I might be old compared to the average age of the Cocoon comunity but I don't feel *that* old. Giacomo > > >>>We have to see where the other code will best fit into other project (if > >>>the POI team cannot be convinced to hold it in their CVS). > >>> > >>We should do our best to convince them that XML support in POI is a good > >>thing for the project (I've given a lot of reasons for that). > >> > > > >Yup. > > > >>One of their objectives seems to keep the library as small as possible. > >>To achieve this, they could package the XML stuff in a separate jar > >>(poi-xml.jar) so that people can use only poi.jar if they don't care > >>about XML. > >> > > > >Seems a valuable way to go for them. > > > >Any comments from the POI side? > > > Not up to now. And this makes me wonder even more about the support of > these 100+ classes... I'm gonna bring this discussion to poi-dev. Gosh, > one more mailing list :( > > Sylvain > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
