> From: Torsten Curdt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Guys, guys, guys... > > > Let me state the following: > > a) There shouldn't be two places where one can define the sitemap > > components, > > so it's rather the xconf or the sitemap. But having both is absolutly > > confusing.
It's not more confusing then empty components declarations in the sub-sitemaps. How your sitemap writer will know what components are available? Following the logic, all the components must be redefined in the subsitemap. > Actually I don't think it's confusing... there are system components and > custom components... but that's why need the cocoon-blocks soon! I agree with this. > > b) Having said a), if we decide for the xconf, it will *not* be possible > > to define custom components in sub-sitemaps! But it should be possible to define them in the sitmap.xconf file accompanying sitemap.xmap. > this is fine as long as we have a custom.xconf (see the current discussion > on blocks etc) Again: > > ComponentConfigurations shouldn't be in the sitemap!! Makes sense to me. > > c) If we opt for defining the components in the sitemap (as it is now) > > we help the sitemap editor in writing the pipelines as he can simply > > see which components are available. > > Sorry, but you gave this argument also when talking about the parameter > action stuff... But then let me be the devil advocat: Shouldn't we also > put the roles into the xconf so the xconf-editor knows which roles are > available??? > > Come on... that's the price you have to pay for modularity... if you don't > do it this way you will end up with one huge config file. I doubt you want > that. Good point. > > Hmm, currently I'm thinking of voting -1 for defining the components > > in the xconf. This would create a deadlock. Very interesting > > and funny thing... > > :) I guess we will find a sollution for this... > > > Ok... this discussion shows it clearly: we need the cocoon-blocks ASAP! Yup. > I'm +5 for leaving everything as it is right now and concentrate on the > blocks. Then this dicussion becomes obsolete... +-0 on moving components back, +-0 on leaving as it is, +10 for blocks. > I was so glad to get the components section out of the sitemap... I hear you... :) Vadim > -- > Torsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
