Jeremy Quinn wrote: > Does your Blocks scheme go as far as making components like XIndice, SQL, > POI, FOP, LDAP etc. as Blocks, shared by other Blocks that are more > application specific?
Yes, exactly. > One comment: > > I would like to see the ability for a block to have a URL base or context > for it's content to be different to it's actual location, the same way you > can overlay the context of two sub-sitemaps like <slash-edit/> does, or be > able to keep actual content separate from associated classes etc., because > maybe it is to be modified by site users, etc. Ok, do you think the proposed solution mets your needs? -- Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be able to give birth to a dancing star. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche -------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]