Jeremy Quinn wrote:

> Does your Blocks scheme go as far as making components like XIndice, SQL,
> POI, FOP, LDAP etc. as Blocks, shared by other Blocks that are more
> application specific?

Yes, exactly.

> One comment:
> 
> I would like to see the ability for a block to have a URL base or context
> for it's content to be different to it's actual location, the same way you
> can overlay the context of two sub-sitemaps like <slash-edit/> does, or be
> able to keep actual content separate from associated classes etc., because
> maybe it is to be modified by site users, etc.

Ok, do you think the proposed solution mets your needs?

-- 
Stefano Mazzocchi      One must still have chaos in oneself to be
                          able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                             Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to