Ugo Cei wrote:
>
> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> > I must be entirely honest with you, Michael: I have the perception that
> > there are just a few person on this list who understand what you are
> > talking about because they haven't seen Xopus in serious action.
>
> I have finally been able to put my hands on a serious workstation
> running IE6 and I must admit that Xopus is simply wonderful.
> Maybe what is shown in the demo at the Q42 site is not a complete
> picture of it's capabilities, but it's been enough to make me
> and all of my coworkers very excited.
Nice to hear this :) [finally the picture starts to come across]
> In the meantime, I've been experimenting with the XUL <editor>,
> but if I'm not mistaken it is not possible to instantiate an editor
> if the XUL file is not loaded from a "chrome://" URL. This pretty much
> rules out the possibility of producing pages for Mozilla with an
> embedded editor from Cocoon, doesn't it? :(
I don't picture us using <editor> at all, so this shouldn't be a
problem.
<editor> is something they use for HTML composing and email composing
and it's an all or nothing editing-type, we don't want that.
When they will implement contentEditable for mozilla (remember to vote
on bugzilla for that! bug# 97284!), you just have to write a bunch of
javascript around that feature and turn that attribute on (either on the
server side or on the client side)... but I see no needs to use XUL for
that.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
