Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
> > Theodore W. Leung wrote:
> >
> > As I recall, Dirk was the one who suggested licenses next to the jar
> > files -- this is what all the other XML projects are doing.
> >
> > FOP did not resolve their license issue with Jimi -- they decided to put
> > a "go here and download Jimi from Sun" readme file in.
> >
> > Also, you guys still have an issue with Jisp, because the license only
> > covers source distribution, not binary -- kind of like djb's Qmail
> > license.
> >
>
> So we have to give up our new installed, clean solution with a separate
> legal directory and follow the other projects by putting the licenses
> next to the jars.
No, wait a second. Is this official?
I mean, is there any document that *explicitly* indicates where the
licenses should be?
If not, I would propose to have /legal as a repository of licenses to
keep things clean in the entire xml.apache CVS.
No, it's not to be picky, but to keep things well ordered.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
