Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>So my proposal was to allow to locally "substract" a label defined at
>the component level. The above snippet would then become :
>
> <map:match pattern="body-todo.xml">
> <map:generate type="file" src="xdocs/todo.xml" label="-content"/>
> <map:transform src="stylesheets/todo2document.xsl" label="content"/>
> <map:transform src="stylesheets/document2html.xsl"/>
> <map:serialize/>
> </map:match>
>>This is about a todo that says "View must start not from the first
>>encountered label, but from the last one".
If Views start from the last label, which IMHO make sence, but then
label="-content" is unnecessary.
>My opinion is that there are some uses case where automatic jump isn't
>good. Let's consider the following :
> <map:view name="books" from-label="books">
> ...
> <map:aggregate element="root">
> <map:part src="isbn-codes.xml" label="books"/>
> <map:part src="authors.xml"/>
> <map:aggregate>
> <map:transform src="isbn2books.xsl" label="books"/>
> <map:transform src="books2html.xsl"/>
> <map:serialize/>
>
>The "books" view should give the list of books. With automatic jump, the
>above only gives a list of isbn codes and we cannot apply
>"isbn2books.xsl". On the contrary, explicit labels mean that there's no
>jump to the view from map:aggregate and that the stylesheet is correctly
>applied.
>So, in short, my opinion is that labels of map:part should be for
>_selecting_ which parts belong to the view, and that view branching
>should depend _only_ on the labels of map:aggregate.
>What is your opinion ?
Good idea!
Volker
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volker Schmitt
BASF IT Services GmbH
Ludwigshafen, Germany
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
