Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>At 2:18 pm +0100 27/3/02, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>
>>Torsten Curdt wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>>
>>>>TreeProcessor will be the default engine in the next release.
>>>>I would like to see it set as default starting right away.
>>>>
>>>>What do you guys think?
>>>>
>>>...there are still some issues...
>>>
>>Which ones ? Jeremy found a bug in view handling a few hours after 2.0.2
>>went out, but it's now fixed.
>>
>>There are still some ongoing discussions about views, but it's not
>>treeprocessor-specific and it behaves just like the compiled engine.
>>
>>>as soon as everything is fixed +1
>>>
>>Well, from my POV, +1 ;)
>>
>>Sylvain
>>
>
>
>Sorry, there was still the little issue of this working in Compiled, but
>not Interpreted:
>
><map:aggregate element="root">
> <map:part type="request" element="req"/>
> <map:part src="docs{target}" element="original"/>
></map:aggregate>
>
>TreeProcessor complains about the missing src parameter.
>
>regards Jeremy
>
Jeremy, does this really work with the compiled engine ?
Consider the following extract from sitemap.xsl :
<xsl:template match="map:part">
<xsl:param name="ca"/>
<xsl:if test="not(@src)">
<xsl:call-template name="error">
<xsl:with-param name="message">src attribute missing in
aggregates part element</xsl:with-param>
</xsl:call-template>
</xsl:if
...seems like the treeprocessor is right when it complains about a
missing "src" ;-)
Sylvain
--
Sylvain Wallez
Anyware Technologies Apache Cocoon
http://www.anyware-tech.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
