----- Original Message ----- From: "Ovidiu Predescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ivelin Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 10:33 PM Subject: Re: [status & RT] design challenges
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:03:25 -0600, "Ivelin Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I dare to challange our sitemap gurus to make a comparative analisys of the > > Jakarta Workflow engine and C2 sitemap. > > > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/workflow/ > > Workflow's approach appears to be based on a finite state machine > model. Checkout the sample control file at: > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/workflow/src/wizard-de mo/WEB-INF/wizard.xml?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > The same approach can be modeled in Cocoon today using actions. > > However a much better approach is the one based on > continuations. Check out the Schecoon calculator sample at: I have actually seen it and was hoping that you can elaborate a bit on the advantages of continuations vs. state machine. > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/xml-cocoon2/src/scratchpad/schecoon/webapp/exa mples/calc/calc.js?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup > > and look at the additional resources used by it. > > It is my opinion that this model provides a much better way of > describing the flow in Web applications and perhaps in Web services as > well. How so? I would like to understand more. Ivelin > > Regards, > Ovidiu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
