At 5:11 pm +0200 5/4/02, Daniel Fagerström wrote:
>> For sure we need more symmetry and more functionality in the pipelines.
>> If multiplexing and pipe-aware selection are the way to implement them
>> is yet to be understood.
>
>Agreed, it is definitly my, (and all the other raving "pipe-aware
>selection" fans out there ;) ) resposibility to provide examples on how
>elegantly you can construct webapps with the help of just a few extra
>sitemap components. I hope to be able to provide some example code and
>an RT quite soon. Until then some sceptisism seem like a sound strategy.
Maybe I do not recognise the differences yet, but the examples you provided
for how "pipe-aware selection" would work, are all possible without such a
selector, please see the 'editor.xmap' in <slash-edit/>.
Furthermore, is there REALLY a difference between these two pipelines:
- pipeline1 -
/ \
request -> A -> X - pipeline2 - X -> C -> response
\ /
- pipelineN -
request -> A -> P1 -> P2 -> P3 -> C -> response
(where Pn are a group of Transformations/Actions etc.)
Apart from how you would arrange them differently in the Sitemap, what is
the real need to have parallel processes?
regards Jeremy
--
___________________________________________________________________
Jeremy Quinn Karma Divers
webSpace Design
HyperMedia Research Centre
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.media.demon.co.uk>
<phone:+44.[0].20.7737.6831> <pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
