+1
I'm also a bit confused by the cocoon:
proto. Isn't there more to it than just forward?
The parameters to forward are request attributes correct?
You can't add request parameters with server side forward.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Konstantin Piroumian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:47 AM
Subject: [PROPOSAL] map:redirect-to vs. map:forward
> Hi, team!
>
> I'd like to propose to add a <map:forward path="" /> node to sitemap.
> Behavior should be the same as <map:redirect-to uri="cocoon:/..." />.
> As redirect and forward are absolutely different in servlet environment
then
> it would be better to have separate elements for them. I'd leave
> <map:redirect-to /> for real redirects (with 302 status code) and use
> <map:forward /> for all internal forwards.
>
> IMHO, forwarding is more obvious then redirect to 'cocoon:/...' uris and
> this will reduce the number of questions in users list about the
redirection
> and its parameters. Also, I'd like to propose to add parameters support to
> <map:forward />:
>
> <map:forward path="next">
> <map:parameter name="page" value="{page}" />
> </map:forward>
>
> What do you think?
>
> --
> Konstantin
> _________________________________________
> Konstantin Piroumian
> Lead Developer
> ICQ#: 2297575
> * Work Tel#: +7 095 795 0520 * 1288
> * More ways to contact me <http://web.icq.com/wwp?Uin=2297575>
> i See more about me <http://kot-p.hotbox.ru/>
> _________________________________________
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
