On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Diana Shannon wrote: > > > So, Diana, please, introduce yourself and introduce your plan of action > > (as you did with me privately) so that the rest of the community can > > vote. > > I've been happily working with Cocoon (1 and 2) for the past eighteen > months. My clients and I love it. As a user, however, its frustrating to > be unable to assist in Cocoon's development because I lack the > high-order architectural understanding and experience to contribute > code. So, I decided to ask Stefano if the project could use a little > editing assistance, to help plug some of the holes many new users seem > to fall through when they read the documentation. > > My background is a mix of programming, design, and educational product > development. At 39, I'm probably a grandmother compared to the rest of > you.
Hey, there are some older people like you here, belive me ;) > I have an engineering degree from Dartmouth College (home of BASIC > and time-sharing systems). Over the years, I've used lots of different > programming languages in my work which has focused primarily on > developing simulation-based training tools. My language of choice over > the past few years has been Java. I used to provide systems integration > and consulting services to a number of publishers and presses in the > States (where I learned/applied all major style/grammar conventions for > publications). I've also been an author/co-author of a number of > software- and print-based educational tools, as well as an editor for > the works for others. So you could say I've experienced first-hand the > demands and expectations of publishing. > > However, I need to make a small disclaimer. I am not a technical > document editor/writer by training. I have never served, in a formal > capacity, as a technical document editor/writer. If someone more > qualified than I would like to step forward to do this job, I would be > *more* than willing to step back and assist that person. However, I do > have a strong background and lengthy experience in writing, editing and > copy editing, particularly with international teams. Please understand > that I do have tremendous respect for the current Cocoon docs, > considering the amazing fact that so many authors are writing in a > non-native language. I have worked in many non-English environments > myself (primarily Spanish, French, Russian, and a few others), and know > how difficult that can be (at least for me). My goal, as an > editor/coordinator, would be simply to increase the efficiency of > learning efforts for users and to make a stronger impression on some of > management types who might be evaluating Cocoon. > > If I were to do this job, here's how I might begin. Please understand I > wasn't considering this level of commitment when I initially approached > Stefano. Therefore, I haven't had a lot of time to prepare my thoughts. > > 1. Post a questionnaire to developer and users lists, asking for > feedback on the shortcomings of existing documentation as well as > suggestions for new documentation. Hopefully we get some more precise answers to point us to the shortcomings than simple stating "Cocoon lacks docs". > 2. Harvest archives for more feedback on problems/holes/needs. Monitor > lists for emerging needs, potential contributors, etc. This is a good point. Usually developers are not very sensible to monitor questions and fill up the FAQ with it. > 3. Post to lists a summary of all feedback received. +1 showing transparency of the coordination work. > 4. Post to list an outline/action plan/framework proposal to address > problems. Ask for comments. > 5. Decide on a plan with a vote. +1 > 6. Invite contributions of all shapes and sizes from users/developer > list. Contributions can be rough drafts, outlines, code snippets, etc. The mailing lists itself contains alot of tips and tricks to be a source for it but probably you meant this in 1) as well. > 7. Start editing existing docs. Start authoring new docs. +1 > 8. Develop style guide and author's tips for all future submissions. How does the Forrest project play into this? > 9. Recruit/invite other editors/authors/reviewers to assist with ongoing > effort +100 > Down the road, point 9 for me is crucial. I'm probably going to be the > kind of contributor who can commit in big blocks, not a steady stream. I > do monitor the lists on a daily basis, though, so this kind of effort > will complement my existing habits. Sounds like a good plan to me. +1 Giacomo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]