Hi Gianugo, thanks for explaining, one more question: see below
> > - What are the reasons behind deprecating xmldb-generator? > > There was no reason for it anymore, given that FileGenerator > was able to > handle the XML:DB pseudo protocol directly. A Source is much more > flexible and there was no loss of functionality. Well... one thing I liked about the generator was that you could pass a lot of stuff as parameters. Although in the original xmldb-generator only the xpath parameter was used, but my custom generator also used depth parameter, and because x-hive offers so much more options for querying in their api, I can imagine I would need a lot of parameters. The way this is solved in the xmldb-source, by putting a # behind the url, would IMHO become less elegant as more parameters are added. So I wonder what other mechanisms could be used for calling parameters on a source, if I'm using different parameters in each map:mathch > > > - Should I write a source or a generator for X-Hive? (or, > has anyone looked into this already) > > I'd definitely go for the Source. And I'd be personally interested to > have a look at it :-) > > Ciao, > > -- > Gianugo > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
