Hi, DS>Oh, I'm really sorry. I certainly didn't mean to do this. I DS>wanted stay general in my inventory/assessment, so I grouped DS>a lot of documents together. My approach was probably overly DS>general, and my apologies to anyone who feels I DS>overlooked/underestimated their contribution. And please DS>understand a negative sign (-) for a document category does DS>not imply poor quality, just insufficient quantity (i.e. DS>more documents needed). I'm certainly *very* much aware DS>and appreciative of your contribution as well as the effort DS>it took to compile it. DS> DS>Do you think some of these "performance tips" warrant reclassification DS>and expanded treatment (more elaboration) as a "best practice" item?
Geh, no problem Diana... The document is a loose summary of emails, mostly answered in the Cocoon user list (by vadim "master_of_the_userlist" gritsenko). It was just a idea to summarize the contributions to centralize the knowledge. Maybe there is a better way to handle this. Feel free to make it better or integrate somewhere. It was just my ego which felt a little bit ignored :-)). Greets Gerhard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
