On May 3, 2002, David Crossley wrote:
> A) Establish a new area under scratchpad for the Draft > documentation, probably at src/scratchpad/documentation/ As per my earlier post on file naming conventions, I think we need a similar setup: src/scratchpad/documentation/xdocs/faqs/XXXXXX.xml src/scratchpad/documentation/xdocs/howtos/XXXXXX.xml (or XXXXX directories for multi-page docs) src/scratchpad/documentation/xdocs/tutorials/XXXXXX.xml (or XXXXX directories for multi-page docs) src/scratchpad/documentation/xdocs/examples/XXXXXX.xml (or XXXXX directories for multi-page docs) src/scratchpad/documentation/xdocs/guides/XXXXXX.xml (or XXXXX directories for multi-page docs) The examples section is intended to include community contributions of static and dynamic code snippets. I think Cocoon's current dynamic examples need static overview pages with links as appropriate to the dynamic pages which illustrate functionality. The page layout of the example overview should be follow the documentation skin used by other docs. I think any build should be able to distinguish static documentation from dynamic (examples). In other words, dynamic example pages shouldn't be integrated into the static build. > I will start to investigate that, though i will certainly need help > with Cocoon's Ant build.xml files ... wow, they are complex. We need to make it easy for QA people, some of whom are probably going to be somewhat conservative (and newbie) users. I'm not sure builds are right for everyone, especially those who don't (yet) keep up with the head branch. Do we have *any* meaningful statistics as to how many people download binaries vs. source files? Do we know if users actually build their versions or simply download the latest binaries? Some preliminary thoughts: - a downloadable minimal WAR just for scratchpad (and existing) documentation work, based on release features, not head. This could be a variation of the MyApp project Konstantin is developing. - downloadable files containing scratchpad docs which users drop into a documentation directory of sorts - a separate cvs branch, just for docs I'm not suggesting we don't need builds for this. I just think we need a few more options to meet the future needs of all contributors. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]