Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > David Crossley wrote: > > > > Would someone please clarify what needs to happen > > with documentation in regard to the CVS branches. > > > > I have been updating some documents and adding some > > new ones. I have been adding this only to the HEAD of > > CVS and not into the 2.0.3 branch. > > > > I gather that only code bugfixes need to go into the > > 2.0.3 branch. Is that correct? I am trying to minimise work. > > --David > > The 2.0.3 branch is a "bugfixes only" branch, this means no > new or experimental code should go in there. > I think if the documentation is valid for 2.0.3 as well > it should go there, too. Because if we do a 2.0.3 release > all will benefit from this new docs asap.
Ah thanks. Yes it is important to get some new docs out with the next release. I had forgotten about that aspect. --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
