On Fri, 24 May 2002 15:30:49 +0200, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ps: while I understand this setup in terms of security etc, I'd prefer > scp for Forrest's publication process, so that we can simply send a > tarball and expand it in-place on xml.apache.org. That means of course > we don't keep a CVS history of the website anymore, and loose the > comment facility inherent to that. Anyone any comments on this over > here? I think is better if we use CVS, it's just easier to synchronize when multiple people perform updates, and minimizes the possibility of data loss. Messing around with files in place quickly grows out of control, and makes changes very difficult to track. Just my $.02, Ovidiu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
