On 28.May.2002 -- 04:01 PM, Christian Haul wrote:
> On 27.May.2002 -- 10:32 AM, Christian Haul wrote:
> > On 26.May.2002 -- 01:35 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > > Christian Haul wrote:
> > > >On 24.May.2002 -- 04:00 PM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Chris, what about passing the full object model instead of just the
> > > >>Request to {Input, Output}Modules ? This would allow a wider range of
> > > >>implementations.
> >
> > Almost done. It causes some larger modifications to the new
> > DatabaseActions since they cannot inherit the central setColumn method
> > anymore.
>
> OK, I'm done. Modules now use objectModel instead of the request
> object. Necessary changes to actions / matchers that currently use
> modules are finished.
>
> Now someone more knowledgeable of the sitemap variables'
> implementation can tackle the suggestion. :-)
>
> To followup on Nicola Ken's comment, we could have a sitemap: pseudo
> protocol for variables as we know them now and a module: pseudo
> protocol for input modules.
Should have been
Like
<map:generate src="{sitemap:1}"/>
<!-- sitemap variable named "1" -->
<map:generate src="{module:request-param:name}"/>
<!-- value obtained from input module "request-param" for an attribute named "name"
-->
<map:generate src="file.xml"/>
<!-- value "file.xml" -->
<map:generate src="{cocoon://file.xml}"/>
<!-- value obtained from other pipeline -->
<map:generate src="cocoon://file.xml"/>
<!-- value "cocoon://file.xml" -->
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
