The actual level 4 drivers.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/default.asp?URL=/downloads/sample.as
p?url=/MSDN-FILES/027/001/779/msdncompositedoc.xml

Are these considered to be slow?

I sent off a quick email to JTurbo asking them to compare their driver
against MS's.

Sorry if this is off-topic, but I'm tuning my Cocoon app and am very
interested in any improvement I can get.

Steve

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 10:20 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
> 
> 
> Do you mean the ODBC bridge or MS's actual level 4 (I think) 
> JDBC drivers?  There's also a product called JTurbo which is 
> a full JDBC driver for SQL.
> 
> J.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stephen Ng [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2002 3:11 pm
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
> > 
> > 
> > Oh!
> > 
> > I'm using the MS JDBC Drivers.  If I have to use SQL 
> Server, is there 
> > another set of drivers I could use instead that would be faster?
> > 
> > Steve
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 2:14 AM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: Generator for SQL Server
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Just a note on SQL Server: the Microsoft drivers really suck,
> > > and the performance is dismal. Changing drivers would help anyway.
> > > 
> > > There is a link to a performance comparison between db in the
> > > archive, I think the thread was about Access.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >             - verba volant, scripta manent -
> > >    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Stephen Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:10 AM
> > > Subject: RE: Generator for SQL Server
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I'm using SQL Server and would be interested a performance
> > > boost too, but, relative to all the other stuff going on, is 
> > > the JDBC overhead significant?
> > > 
> > > Steve
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Horst Rutter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:30 PM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Generator for SQL Server
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we have a way to read in XML directly from SQL Server
> > 2000? That
> > > > would be really cool and a performance booster, because
> > there is no
> > > > need for a SQL to XML transformation. I guess this also
> > > means one has
> > > > to workaround JDBC for this. Anybody has a clue what it
> > > would take to
> > > > build smth like this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Horst
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> ==============================================================
> =========
> Information in this email and any attachments are 
> confidential, and may not be copied or used by anyone other 
> than the addressee, nor disclosed to any third party without 
> our permission.  There is no intention to create any legally 
> binding contract or other commitment through the use of this email.
> 
> Experian Limited (registration number 653331).  
> Registered office: Talbot House, Talbot Street, Nottingham NG1 5HF
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to