Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> From: "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think I wrote that comment more than a year ago :-|
> ... it's time I take a deeper look into it.
> It should throw a RNF exception, not get there...
> 
> Anyway, the senderror part is wrong as you pointed out :-/

A quick recommendation on how to fix (rather hack) it?
Omitting building the notification and simply return after
the sendError()? I'm not after the final, perfect patch...

J.Pietschmann



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to