From: "Peter Royal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday 06 June 2002 03:19 pm, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> > > > your votes:
> > > >
> > > > Shall we remove them from 2.0.3?
> > >
> > > -1, since that is still a point-release from the original 2.0
> >
> > IIRC, the deprecation -> removal cycle was defined on this list as
> > "deprecate, wait 3-4-5-6 month, remove", but was not tied to the version
> > numbering.
> >
> > Am I wrong?
>
> No, you're right.
>
> My logic was thus:
>
> 2.0.2 -> 2.0.3
> should be a relatively painless upgrade, mainly bugfixes, few new
features.
>
> 2.0.x -> 2.1
> will require some effort to adapt to new changes.
>
> Why not lump in with the 2.1 changes and remove one less (potential)
hurdle
> in a 2.0.x -> 2.0.3 upgrade.
>
> I guess I'm more -0. The change won't impact me, but why not wait for 2.1
to
> impact those that will be.
2.0.3 means third bugfix release of 2.0.
The more we touch it, the more it can gain the problems of 2.1 along with
the fixes.
BTW, when are we releasing?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
