Vadim Gritsenko wrote: > > Ditto. Just make sure that Excalibur is built with appropriate version > too - it has JDBC code too. > That's the problem I hinted at in my first email. Doing it correctly we would have to build two versions of excalibur (1.2 compatible and 1.4 compatible) ourselfs! And this is something I really don't want to do. This would result in a real nightmare and which version do we keep in our CVS/lib directory? Can we assure that Excalibur is the only component we have to take into account?
Now, making our lifes easier I'm in favour of building only a 1.2 compatible version (excalibur and all other projects are mostly build with a JDK 1.2 and not JDK 1.4). So we could make a binary distribution for 1.2,1.3 and that would even run with 1.4 except perhaps when it comes to JDBC. So anyone really requiring JDBC 3.0 has to build Excalibur and Cocoon himself. Comments? Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
