> From: Stephan Michels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, John Morrison wrote: > > > > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I refactored the profiling code a little bit, now the > > > SAXConnectors are not used anymore for profiling, making > > > the use of profiling a little bit easier. > > > > > > But I think we should now vote for the future of SAXConnectors > > > as we already have the (incompatible) changes with the > > > handling of event and stream pipelines; so another one in > > > this area doesn't hurt. > > > > > > So, here we go: > > > > > > a) Deprecate the SAXConnectors and remove it asap. > > +1 > > +0
+0 > > > b) Remove it now > > +0 > > +1 +0 > > > c) Change the concept, so that it is possible to configure > > > the used SAXConnector on a map:pipeline base. > > +0 > > +0 +1 > > > d) Leave it as it is > > -1 > > -1 -1 Vadim > > > I'm +1 on b) and -1 on d). > > > > > > c) seems to be FS, but if there is a real need for SAXConnectors > > > we should go for c), so this is a +0 on c). > > > > I've not needed it and if I do I'll use the new so +0. > > > > > PS: I like clear votes... > > > > :) > > > > J. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
