On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 08:39 AM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> Personally in the projects I do on krysalis I simply add the person to > the authors. You know, personally, I like to share credit as much as possible, even when I do most of the work. It's easy to do, it's free to give, and for the most part, everyone benefits. But not everyone thinks this way. > A one-line patch can be more important than the file itself, and making > the committer make the decision is not predictable enough. Of course, but not always. Unfortunately, it gets subjective. I'm trying to figure out what's fair. > The first author is the creator, and then the others. So, you are proposing anyone who submits a patch -- regardless of how substantive -- gets added to the list of authors, after the creator? I assume you are ok with the idea that revision content would still be useful. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
