> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Good point. > > > > +1 for block.xinfo > > > Hmm. Beyond .xml, .xsl, . xhtml and .fo there ought to > be .xconf, .xmap, .xtarget (yuck!) and now .xinfo > extensions associated with the XML edit mode. > It's getting out of hand. > What's wrong with sitemap.xml and blockinfo.xml?
If your sitemap is somewhere in WEB-INF then having sitemap.xml would be obvious, but if you have sitemap in the same directory where your content files are located then one could view your sitemap by simply typing 'sitemap.xml' in request path. To prevent this you would have to setup a special pipeline in your sitemap or use resource constraints in web.xml. Konstantin > > HTH > J.Pietschmann > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
