Diana Shannon wrote: > > On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 06:35 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > So, we need do to the following: > > > > a) Testing if everything works, espcially with regards to the different > > JVMs - I did a quick SQL test with both versions and they both > > worked. > > > > b) Update the documentation to include the "jvm-target" property etc. > > This > > should also go into the README > > > > c) Layout the distribution > > d) Check your docs for any 2.1-specific references and flag them (with > <note> or similar). > > I may not get through each and every doc, so if you know the docs you > have > contributed have 2.1-specific content (either the doc as a whole or > specific > content within), please flag them as such. A while back, we decided on > this list > to sync HEAD and release docs to make it easier on committers working on > docs. > This included the provision that all 2.1-oriented docs would be noted to > readers. > I have added this info to a number of docs already, but I haven't > concluded my general > inventory of *all* docs. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I > realize this is a bit of a > manual hack, and I look forward to Forrest transition (coming soon) and > solving this > more elegantly, but I think the priority ATM should be user-friendly > docs, however > we achieve it. > +1
> FYI, the only docs not synced remain changes.xml, todo.xml, > sitemap.xmap, installing/index.xml, and > installing/jars.xml. > changes.xml can't be synced as their are different changes to the different versions. > > Ah, and finally a release date. If no problems or big bugs are found, I > > would propose monday, 15th of July. > > +1. Also, Carsten, let's include some language with the release notice > about all the new > docs accompanying it. We have *lots* of new content since 2.0.2. I'll > provide a count if that helps! > A list would be better...but, yes, that's a good idea. Can someone help us here? > FYI: I'll update the live site for docs on Sunday if that works with > this schedule. > No, it doesn't help - because the docs need to be updated *after* the release as we have for example the version number somewhere in the docs etc. and it might be that something goes wrong during the release on monday. I won't prevent you from updating the docs on Sunday, but we need to update them again after the release. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
