Torsten Curdt wrote: >>P.S. >>I use SQLTransformer only, and I'm happy with it :) don't deprecate it :( >> >> > >I guess it would be cool for both ESQL and the SQLTransformer to share code as >well as syntax. But this will probably break backwards compatibility for >both. IMHO it could be nice to start a new combo of XSQL logicsheet and >XSQLTransformer from scratch. > > Off the top of my head this sounds good.
>We could then deprecate ESQL and SQLTransformer and only apply bugfixes. So >it's up to them to upgrade to the new combo syntax or keep the old stuff. > >How about that? > Sounds good to me. But I would ask that there be a period of deprecation after which the old components move out of the main build. Let those who want to use Cocoon 2.3 with 2.0 components do so at their own peril. Kind of an EOL (end of life) mode. Otherwise to paraphrase Stefano, you hasten the cold death of the Cocoon universe. -Andy >-- >Torsten > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
