Amen.
Vadim > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > John Morrison wrote: > > [Vote 1] > > [+1] Seperate "apps" module: xml-cocoon2-apps > > > > [Vote 2] > > [+1] cvs ci for xml-cocoon2-apps goes to list xml-cocoon2-cvs > > [-1] cvs ci for xml-cocoon2-apps goes to list xml-cocoon2-apps-cvs > > > > <personal>I feel happiest if everyone working on the > > main project saw the uses their contibutions were being > > put too and I'm sure people working on apps should really > > keep upto date with the main project. This may have a knock > > on effect of somebody with just -apps karma submitting > > sufficient patches and being added to the main cvs! :)</personal> > > +1 to alll you say :-) > > > [Vote 3] > > [+1] People voted cvs access for documentation to have > > full karma > > [-1] Module "hack" for xml-cocoon2-docs to do: > > cvs co xml-cocoon2/xdocs > > > > <personal>If people want to only co the xdocs then > > they can, but I think it would be best to document > > how to do so than create a "hack" (sorry Ken).</personal> > > No need to be sorry, it was just a RT. > > I think both you and Andy easily convinced me about this, so +1 for > having the docs people be voted for full karma access, because > > 1) Andy is right, documentation and code have at least the same level of > importance, and since they are related, should stay in the same CVS, > even conceptually > > 2) For us committers are just committers, there are no second-level > citizens; if the documentation is where the code is, then there > shouldn't be different types of committers. > > > PS, nice addendum Ken :) > > :-D > > -- > Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] > - verba volant, scripta manent - > (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) > --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
