On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Looking at the last great threads, I noticed many messages > complaining that Cocoon is not stable, even from some > developers. > > Is this really true? Is Cocoon not stable (and I mean > 2.0.3 of course) ? > > Our experience with several productive installations currently > proves the opposite. It's stable and did never crash or > had to be restarted since months. I must confess that we > are using a version between 2.0 and 2.0.1.
We are using similar version in productive installation and I fully support this statement: Stable and did never crash or had to be restarted since months. And I'd like to add it is fast compared to similar products (if you'd like to compare Cocoon with other products). Giacomo > > And if 2.0.3 is really that unstable, we should immediately > fix this and find out what has changed since 2.0.1 which > causes this! > > So, constructive reports about unstable conditions are welcome. > > Carsten > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
