On 16.Aug.2002 -- 03:22 PM, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Christian Haul wrote:
> >On 14.Aug.2002 -- 04:28 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Team,
> >>
> >>we recently had our thread about Cocoon organization etc. and
> >>it's now time to recapitulate the results.
> >>
> >>One main result is to split the core from optional things that
> >>we from now on call modules (and not blocks!).
> >
> >
> >Objection! We have "modules" already. This is going to cause
> >confusion.
>
> And CVS modules? ;-)
>
> >After looking in my Oxford Thesaurus, the following alternatives might
> >be suitable:
> >
> > portion
> > element
> > ingredient
> > unit
> > bit
> > fragment
> > piece
> > item
> > particle
> >
> >I like "particle" and "ingredient" best :-)
> >
> >"Oh, you need to include the XMLForm ingredient for that..."
>
> I think that they simply are Cocoon "component"s, no?
Although this is a good term, I fear the close relationship with
Avalon (-> Avalon Components) will cause confusion as well.
Chris.
--
C h r i s t i a n H a u l
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837 7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
