On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Stephan Michels wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2002, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >
> > > Blocks and modules are *not* the same.
> > >
> > > Putting it very simple, blocks are a plug-in mechanism for
> > Cocoon and the
> > > modules concept is only a better cvs structure for Cocoon.
> > > So modules is only about organizing things and can be done by simply
> > > restructuring the cvs and change minor parts of the build system. So,
> > > these modules are possible today.
> > >
> > > Blocks in contrast need to be designed and implemented - it's
> > not possible
> > > today and has a different aim.
> > >
> > > However, a module can later implement a block of course.
> > >
> > > Looking at all these threads and mails, it seems to me that
> > more energy is
> > > spend on giving things a name rather than implementing them.
> >
> > That true ;-) But without a name I couldn't start. Perhaps we should
> > vote, which name we should take.
> >
> ok, +1 for module
+1 for 'extension' (short 'ext'). (But 'module' also okay).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
