Brainstorm 1) What component is it that we speak of?
flow controller flow-controller director flow-director This defines an application flow <map:flow language=\"JavaScript\"> <map:script src=\"blah.js\"/> </map:flow> A \"director\" in a play makes the actors act according to a script, it could work: <map:director language=\"JavaScript\"> <map:script src=\"blah.js\"/> </map:director> Now, what happens when it is time to act according to the script? Is the flow \"called\" or \"used\": <map:call-flow ... <map:use-flow ... or is it a director that directs? <map:direct ... Suggestions: use-flow call-flow direct Personally, I like either \"flow\" and \"use-flow\" or \"director\" and \"direct\". On second thougt \"flow\" and \"use-flow\" is what I like best. (Part of the problem is that \"flow\" can be used both as a noun (the component) and as a verb (the action). \"use-flow\" makes up for this.). my SEK 0.02, for all that it\'s worth... /O --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
