On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > Michael Melhem wrote: > > > > Perhaps its easiest to apply the current patch as is (without the > > "preliminary test against null"). This "preliminary test against null" > > can be introduced in the next patch which will also introduce > > support for the proposed "pipeline-hint syntax". > > > > However, should this plan of action incur the wrath of Carsten > > ;-). Then I could > > invalidate the current patch and re-submit it with the extra null check? > > > "wrath"? :) - I don't cate about the order of the actions it takes to > implement the proposal - so if one way is easier than the other, well > just use it. > But you should take care that the second part does not get lost.
OK, his a quick patch bugzilla [Bug 12443] to make sure this part does not get lost!! Regards Michael Melhem > > Carsten > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
