Torsten wrote: > Guys, isn't it obvious we cannot realy provide errors in a > user friendly > manner since we are delivering the page on-the-fly via SAX? > Buffering the > whole page seems to reduce the positve aspects we get from > using SAX and we > get closer to Cocoon1. > > Maybe we should have two different modes to run cocoon or at > least pipelines > in: buffered and unbuffered. So one could use e.g. buffered > for development > und unbuffered for deployment?!
It seems to me that we should be able to buffer up to a point in the pipeline, which wouldn't COMPLETELY negate the benefits of SAX. In some cases it would be enough to buffer just the output of a Generator, for instance. Or perhaps buffering could be turned on for a particular pipeline with <pipeline buffer="true"> (another pipeline hint!) Con --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
