El Martes, 08 de Octubre de 2002 08:22, Carsten Ziegeler escribió: > Jeff Turner wrote: > > > Just a silly question: are you joking or do you consider this > > > seriously? > > > > Absolutely :) See the other thread. It separates two concerns that are > > currently mixed, and makes module implementation _much_ simpler. I think > > Chris, Konstantin and I are all very happy with it. Now's the time to > > raise objections.. > > Yes, ok, if you are all happy with this...I can't stop you from doing this. > I personally don't like the concept, because the configuration is static in > the cocoon.xconf - I don't see this in the sitemap. > > And yes: I still believe in SoC, which means a usual Cocoon user has only > to edit (and know) the sitemap - he should not care about the cocoon.xconf.
I believe in this too. Carsten, you have my vote. ;) But I dont have voting capabilities here :( I think Cocoon must be able to be changed at run-time. This is a big plus for a production environment and the user surely will welcome this behavior. Just make a little change in the config and continue without stopping the service! The sitemap is a nice example of that. Just a little advise: Think what users will welcome, not how dificult will be code the feature. ;) Antonio Gallardo. > > Carsten > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
