Quoting Piroumian Konstantin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Another comparison: Cocoon vs. Struts. > > http://www.googlefight.com/cgi-bin/compare.pl?q1=Cocoon&q2=Struts&B1=I%27m+F > eeling+Groggy%21%21+Go%21&compare=1&langue=us > > Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts. But after a moment > I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more visibility of the > project (I mean that Struts does not need to be searched, cause it's well > known). So returning to the Cocoon vs. Zope case, if Cocoon is searched less > than Zope this can mean also that Cocoon is easier to find by other means > (e.g. directly from Apache site).
Hmmm, while I was craching up to see that googlefight web (isn't human creativity so amazing sometimes?), with my semantic hat on and with purity mode turned on, I would say that the above is purely and absolutely useless. look at http://www.cocoon1.com and you know what I mean :) In a really semantic search engine, we would have our own URI point to our own topic and we could be able to have a fair semantic-searchfight... but that would mean that, for example, the search engine should be inferring smart enough to understand that if I talk about 'cocoon' on the 'cocoon- [EMAIL PROTECTED]' mail list, than that token should be associated with the topic related to http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/ Yeah, it would be cool, but totally impractical since you'd have to write your emails using RDF-like markup. Bah, I should burn this stupid semantic hat one day. -- Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
