On Thursday 10 October 2002 08:02, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> The more I think about this approach, the more I like it.
> But, I see some problems here:
yepp
> - First one is of course name clashes - I should not define
> a param-prefix which is either already used or already
> defined by an input module.
yepp
> - It's a little bit too verbose, which means I have to type
> a lot to get it working.
>
> It came to my mind to simple use the "type" of the component
> as a prefix:
> <map:match pattern="**">
> <map:generate src="{wildcard:1}"/>
I have been thinking about that too. but then you would have to count the
invidual components... would about the more general level.
{inputmodule:variable(level)}
<map:match pattern="**">
<map:generate src="{1(1)}"/>
or {inputmodule:variable[level]}
<map:match pattern="**">
<map:generate src="{1[1]}"/>
starting either by 1 or 0.
(joerg - with xpath this would be a filter on the ancestor/descendant axis ;)
> And of course {1} and {../1} must still work.
as always - keep backwards compatibly!
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
