> > So we could:
> >
> > 1) leave everything like it is :-(
> > 2) have another blocks directory under scratchpad
> > 3) have a single blocks directory and mark and exclude scratchpad stuff
>
> 4) have a scratchpad directory in every block that needs it.
>
> I'm in favour of 3)
excellent - same here :-)
> We could have a new block "scrachpad-block" (a), append "-scratch" to
> the name e.g. "new-stuff-scratch-block" (b), or just add a comment in
> modules.xml saying it is "pre-alpha quality" (c). Either one is
> fine.
<blocks>
<fop include="true"/>
<myteststuff include="false"
scratch="true"
quality="pre-alpha"
unstable="true"
stable="false"
/>
</blocks>
I'd be in favor of "unstable" or "stable"
> A single scratchpad block would be nice for small additions
> while big ones could opt for "c".
aggreed.
<blocks>
<fop include="true"/>
...
<!-- the following blocks are marked unstable and should be
considered being pre-alpha quality. Their API might change
without notice -->
<myteststuff include="false" unstable="true"/>
<scratchpad include="false" unstable="true"/>
</blocks>
Ok?
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
