>>>>> "David" == David Crossley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> I notice that the RNG grammar is catering for the
David> deliberately broken lint/sitemap.xmap
Actually, it's not deliberately broken - the invalid bits are
commented out.
What I've been doing is then to uncomment them one-by-one to test the
power of the grammar to reject invalid constructs. Those that it fails
to reject, I have added as comments to the grammar file, to provoke
thoughts on what to tackle next.
However, I finding it quite hard to see how to tackle these cases. I
can't work out what the rules ought to be. They are certainly more
complex than the comments against these invalid cases suggest.
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
