Robert Koberg wrote:
What's the point?I thought you were trying to spark the reply we (Joerg, Peter & I) made to come back with some proof that it wasn't, especially given the emphasis :)
We started with Scheme and moved to ECMAScript. Now XSLT is proposed as a flow description language.
What's next? Prolog? oh, no, wait, what about Postscript? no, maybe you like Logo more?
They are all turing-complete languages after all, aren't they?
;-)
[i'm just kidding, don't take this as an insult, ok? just kidding]
--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
