Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Not to pollute the discussion too much, but I just recently became a part of one xml.apache.org project, and have been a member of the Apache community only about 6 months. Before I got involved, though, I was using both Jakarta and xml.apache.org software for quite a while. To me the xml.apache.org brand was always a "subsidiary brand" of ASF, as was Jakarta. It carries enough weight that I have looked here first when I need a piece of software for a project, and will try an Apache project out before a random Sourceforge one every time.What I like most about such a proposal is that it is completely up to the commiters to decide whether they want opt in or opt out.It continues to sound reasonable to me, but I'd personally like to see the Jakarta "brand" continue. Not sure how to *do* that... I don't think the same applies to XML. Note that I asked like the tapestry guys "want to be top level" and it was "well no one will
What do others think?
find us there, we want Jakarta"... They're probably right quite honestly. Half the people I know barely know there is an XML.apache.org...
-Andy
$0.02
--
Ryan Hoegg
ISIS Networks
http://www.isisnetworks.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
