Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > Steven Noels wrote: > > > I will hardcode it in the 2.0.4 branch, however - maybe we can do a > > silent re-release then? > > big -1 to silent re-releases. > > releases *are* by definition immutable. The use of MD5 and SIG to > check-out intrusion and trojianing would be screwed up by silent > re-releases and perceived as security attacks. > As long as I do the releases, I will not do a silent re-release. That's for sure.
Apart from the security points, Stefano mentions, think about all the mirrors, CDs etc. containing a Cocoon release. You will totally confuse people if there are two versions of any release. And doing a 2.0.5 is not much more work than a re-release. Carsten Carsten Ziegeler Open Source Group, S&N AG --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
