Hi Jacob,

Yes, I read your message.
Since Konstantin started responding to your questions, I backed off due to
my poor understanding of the subject and current inability to come up with
an elegant design for the implementation.

Konstantin is participating in the W3C XForms discussions, so he would have
a much better guidance than me at this point. As the thread progresses I may
join with some questions and ideas.

Regards,

Ivelin


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jakob Praher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] XMLForm: Data Provider


> hi Ivelin,
> hi Christian,
> hi Michael,
>
>
> have you looked at my last mail about the introduction of xforms model
> item properties (only the calculate) for calculating depending data and
> linked instances.
>
> it's called  "[Proposal] XForm with linking and model item properties"
>
> is anybody working on something like that?
>
>
> thanks
>
> Jakob
>
>
>
> Am Son, 2002-12-22 um 03.58 schrieb Ivelin Ivanov:
> > I am glad that we already have multiple proposed solutions for a
question
> > which has been raised frequently.
> >
> > You should probably synchrinize with "Michael Homeijer"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Who wrote this:
> > Subject: [possible donation] XmlForm popup sample using sourcewriter
> >
> > And also "Josema Alonso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: FORMS & Xindice
> >
> >
> > I would be glad to consider applying a patch which was agreed upon the
three
> > of you.
> >
> >
> > Ivelin
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Christian Haul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 3:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] XMLForm: Data Provider
> >
> >
> > > Konstantin Piroumian wrote:
> > > > The instance:<xforms:instance xmlns="" id="orderform">
> > > >   <orderForm>
> > > >     <shipTo>
> > > >       <firstName>John</firstName>
> > > >     </shipTo>
> > > >   </orderForm>
> > > > </xforms:instance>
> > >
> > > I hope this comment is not completely off: I have checked in a
transformer
> > > that extracts an (arbitrary) fragment and stores it (as DOM) using an
> > > output
> > > module. This can be used to extract form instance data. Coincidently,
it
> > > is called
> > > SimpleFormInstanceExtractionTransformer ;-)
> > >
> > > Actually, I'm planning to look into XMLForms over the hollidays. I
would
> > > really
> > > like it if it were possible to not write a bean for every form. But
this
> > > might be possible
> > > already only that I don't know....
> > >
> > > Chris.
> > > --
> > > C h r i s t i a n       H a u l
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >      fingerprint: 99B0 1D9D 7919 644A 4837  7D73 FEF9 6856 335A 9E08
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to