Thanks! :-) Antonio
Torsten Curdt dijo: >> This is why I started thinking about this issue and suggested the >> workaround. I think the solutions is not too ugly because is better to >> get 5 rows in a resultset than 8,000 or more, just to get the row >> number 5 and trigger the tag. > > > Thanks for reporting, Antonio. > > I've had a closer look. I think you are right. It's not too bad. > > If one uses the esql:row-count tag (which is an additional count query) > it wouldn't be necessary to get another row because we know about the > total number rows of the result. But since I don't wanna force to have a > count query for everyone using the more-results tag I think we are > better off with the additional row - as you proposed. > > I added this to the javadocs and all the different database query > implementations. Please crosscheck and report back if it works for you. > -- > Torsten > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
