On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 09:05:15AM +0100, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: 
> 
> 
> On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> 
> > >   distributable state and invite (urge!) you to try it. CVSView
> > >   has the same basic functionnalities as the ViewCVS CGI, is generic
> 
> Though also lacks a large number of crucial ones (when browsing it with
> OmbiWeb) such as diff's between arbitrary versions, anotated listings,
> 'clean' downloads of a specfic version.
> 
> > >   Project page at: http://mattam.ath.cx/progs/CVSView.html
> 
> I'd say - nice start; but no-where near where it could be considered as a
> replacement/improvement on the current
> 
>       http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/
> 
> Dw
> 
                        
I did the arbitrary diffs and the downloads today, you can try lattest
version at same URL (I corrected the 404 when d/l'ing the dist, too :).
I have a few questions about things I encountered :

        - Why when having a parameter like (....html?var1=true&doit)
          the parameter 'doit' is ignored ? 
          I suppose this is a malformed URL problem but I'm not sure.

        - To implement the download feature, I needed to set the
          content-type and use a text output method. I get a
          NullPointerException when I do that from the stylesheet, which
          I understand as 'there must be XML data for the serializer'
          (even without serializers after the transformation in the
          sitemap, which is forbiden from what I read).
          My only solution is then to use a 'text/text' mime-type for
          all downloads using the TextSerializer, as it seems I cannot
          set this option dynamically. I tried looking at the Reader
          classes but the doc isn't there, neither at home nor at the
          xml.apache.org site. Any idea ?
        
                        
                                M@t

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to