Michael Wechner wrote:
Hi Michael, I'm part also of the Incubator PMC (Project management commitee).Ivelin Ivanov wrote:I vote for Version #2.
That will follow the spirit of Jakarta which is popular and successful.
The Incubator will give a fair exposure to new projects, while allowing them
to move up, only if they meet a certain threshold of maturity and
popularity.
I think incubator is very fine with us (Wyona) and it also seems fair with regard to other projects.
The incubator is active, and we are recieving now our first project, Tapestry. I have been contacted by OmegaCMS http://www.omegacms.com/tour.html for the possibility of moving to Apache too. Tell me what you think of it, and let us (incubator) know.
Shall we apply on our own at incubator or shall we wait some more time?Yes, we are making our rules as-we-go.
Has incubator officially launched yet (there seem to be no projects so far and some content is still missing)?
The best thing is to decide where you want to land in Apache, and if it's under another project, make that project accept it if possible.
Then apply for incubation by sending a mail with details on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll be waiting for you :-)
Ciao.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
