On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> >Anyway, I think your arguments are better than mine (sniff). > > > >So, we have a TraversableSource or HierarchicalSource or ...? > > I'm not a native speaker, but the definition of traversable given by > dictionary.com makes me prefer hierarchical... You could traverse the hierarchy ;-) > Ah, and what about adding an "exists()" method on Source (it's currently > on WriteableSource) ? That one makes sense and is really useful, as the > current way to know if an URI exists is to try to getInputStream(), > which can be heavy. +1 > About the move() and copy() methods, I don't know if they should be kept > in the new incarnation of this interface. :-/ not another MoveableSource ;-) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
