If I actually get it working, I would certinaly contribute it. Yeah, ugly, but 
probalby no really
CLEAN way to achieve it.
At any rate, many thanks for the guidance - I'll go with a reader. I suspected that 
using the
wrong componenet would cause me grief....
> Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>
>> Andy Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> I have a need to, under specific circumstances, do a
>>> RequestDispatcher.forward out of Cocoon. I've
>>> not found any support for this in Cocoon. Alternatives won't work  since I need to 
>do this
>>> while
>>> preserving request attributes. I would expect to be able to code this  as an 
>Action without
>>> extreme
>>> difficulty, but I thought I would thorw the idea to the list first  and see if 
>anyone has any
>>> ideas, comments, or suggestions...(something other than "No!  Don't  do it!" :)
>>> Many thanks....
>>>
>>
>> Why do I think that reader is much better place for something like  this 
>(...assuming that
>> it's possible...)?
>
>
> Because forwarding delegates the production of the output to the target  resource. 
>But Cocoon
> expects the sitemap to produce something or an  error is displayed.
>
> So the only place where such forwarding is possible is in a Cocoon  component that 
>feeds the
> output with abitrary binary data, and Cocoon  names it a reader ;-)
>
> Andy, would you like to contribute a "ForwardReader", how ugly and  servlet-tied as 
>it may be ?
>
> Sylvain
>
> --
> Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
> http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com { XML, Java, 
>Cocoon,
> OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To 
>unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
"The heights of genius are only measurable by the depths of stupidity."



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to