Sylvain Wallez wrote:
I tend to agree with Sylvain (+1 on addition to CVS, -0 or so on addition to main Cocoon CVS).Christian Haul wrote:On 16.Jan.2003 -- 10:03 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Steven Noels wrote:
Other worry: this means adding yet another mega-functional-component to Cocoon, and I have have been talking offlist about my worries in this direction.I share Steven's feelings (I'm one of the "offlist") : we voted a cocoon-apps module to host Cocoon-related developments that don't belong to the core. And this ultra-specific component typically falls in this category.
We better start using the -apps module then, I guess (and some other components might as well migrate there, too).
I don't discuss its quality nor its usefullness (SAP is used in large companies and this could be a "troyan horse" to bring Cocoon inside), but adding it to the main CVS repository, even in a block, would increase the bloat.
The SAP R/3 connectivity consists of 4 interfaces, 5 implementing classes and a transformer:
...
I think it's not a problem and, given enough interested people, it can always grow to at least size of demo app, if not full-featured app.It is not an application per se but a connectivity
component.
Vadim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
